Improving Model Accuracy in Revit

I’ve been diving into some advanced Revit features lately, and I’ve found that incorporating better coordination protocols can significantly enhance model accuracy. It’s interesting how a simple adjustment in workflow can prevent clashes down the line. I’d love to hear about any specific strategies or tools others have implemented that made a big difference in their projects.

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠‌‌⁠⁠‌⁠‌​‌‍⁠⁠‌⁠​​‌‍‍‌‌‍​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍⁠‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠‌​​⁠​⁠​⁠​​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‌‌‌‌‍‌​​⁠​⁠​‍‌‍‍​‌‍‌⁠​⁠​‍‌‌‍‌‌‍⁠‌‌‌‍​‌‌​​‌‍⁠‌‌‌‌⁠​⁠‌‌‌‌​​‌​⁠​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌​​

I’ve found that using the “Interference Check” tool in Revit can save a ton of time by catching issues early. It’s pretty effective, but make sure all your teams are on the same page about how often to run it — timing can be crucial. Have you tried that yet?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍‌​⁠‍‌​⁠​⁠​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​⁠​​​⁠​⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‍​‌​​‍​⁠‌​‌‌‌⁠‌​⁠​‌‌⁠⁠‌‍‌⁠‌​​⁠​⁠​‌‌⁠‍‍‌​‌⁠‌‌​‌‌⁠‌‌‌‍⁠‍‌‌​​​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

Totally agree! I’ve seen big improvements from setting regular model reviews with teams — @m_turner76, coordination goes a long way in preventing clashes…

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍‌​⁠‍‌​⁠​⁠​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​⁠​​​⁠‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠‌‍‌‍‌⁠‌‌‌‌‌‍​⁠‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌⁠‌⁠​⁠‌‌​‍⁠‌​‍⁠‌‌‍‌‍‌‌​​‌​⁠​​⁠​‌‌⁠‌‍‌​‌‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌

I once improved accuracy by leveraging the ‘View Templates’ feature. It helped streamline visibility settings for our teams, minimizing errors during reviews. Have you tried anything similar, @m_turner76?

‌⁠‍⁠​‍​‍‌⁠‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‍​⁠‌‍​‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍⁠​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌⁠​‍‌‍‌‌‌⁠​​‌‍⁠​‌⁠‍‌​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍‌‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​⁠‌‌​⁠‍​​⁠‍‌​⁠‍‌​⁠​⁠​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‌​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍​⁠​‍​⁠​​​⁠​‍​⁠‌‍​⁠​​​⁠‌‌​⁠​​​⁠‌⁠​‍​‍​‍⁠​​‍​‍‌‍‍​​‍​‍​⁠‍‍​‍​‍‌‌​⁠‌‍⁠‌‌​⁠⁠‌‍‍⁠‌​‍‌‌‌​⁠​⁠‌⁠‌​⁠‌​⁠​‌​⁠‍​‌‌‍​​⁠​⁠‌⁠‍‌‌‌⁠⁠‌‌‌‍​⁠​‌​‍​‍‌⁠⁠‌